Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Biosensors (Basel) ; 12(8)2022 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1987657

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus appeared to be a milder infection initially, but the unexpected outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), commonly called COVID-19, was transmitted all over the world in late 2019 and caused a pandemic. Human health has been disastrously affected by SARS-CoV-2, which is still evolving and causing more serious concerns, leading to the innumerable loss of lives. Thus, this review provides an outline of SARS-CoV-2, of the traditional tools to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, and of the role of emerging nanomaterials with unique properties for fabricating biosensor devices to diagnose SARS-CoV-2. Smart and intelligent nanomaterial-enabled biosensors (nanobiosensors) have already proven their utility for the diagnosis of several viral infections, as various detection strategies based on nanobiosensor devices are already present, and several other methods are also being investigated by researchers for the determination of SARS-CoV-2 disease; however, considerably more is undetermined and yet to be explored. Hence, this review highlights the utility of various nanobiosensor devices for SARS-CoV-2 determination. Further, it also emphasizes the future outlook of nanobiosensing technologies for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques , COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(5): 825-830, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-640749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown has presented a unique challenge for sarcoma care. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the early results and feasibility of surgeries for bone sarcomas during the COVID-19 lockdown. METHODS: Our prospectively collected orthopaedic oncological database was reviewed to include two groups of patients- those who underwent surgery in the immediate 4 weeks before lockdown (non-lockdown group) and those operated in the first 4 weeks of lockdown (lockdown group). All patients were followed-up clinically and telephonically to collect the outcome data. RESULTS: Out of the 91 patients who qualified for inclusion, fifty were classified into the non-lockdown group while 41 patients formed the lockdown group. Both the groups were comparable with respect to baseline demographic parameters. However, during the lockdown period 37 patients (90%) had undergone a major surgical intervention as against 24 patients (48%) in the non-lockdown group (P < .001). There was no significant difference in type of anaesthesia, median estimated blood loss and procedure duration. None of the patients/health care workers had evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 infection at 15 days follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that appendicular bone tumours can be safely operated with adequate precautions during the lockdown period.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/surgery , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sarcoma/surgery , Adult , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , Chondrosarcoma/pathology , Chondrosarcoma/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Limb Salvage/methods , Limb Salvage/standards , Male , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/standards , Osteosarcoma/pathology , Osteosarcoma/surgery , Pandemics , Sarcoma/pathology , Sarcoma, Ewing/pathology , Sarcoma, Ewing/surgery , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL